MOVETHICS · v1.2

Fair Transport Standard

The operational layer that turns Charter principles into observable requirements, safeguards and indicators.

From principle to observable practice

The Charter states the principles. The Standard defines observable requirements and safeguards. Assessment reviews evidence within a defined scope.

A

Mandatory law

Applicable jurisdiction and source required.

B

MOVETHICS requirement

A Standard requirement, not presented as law.

C

Recommended safeguard

Practical protection that strengthens the relationship.

D

Indicator

Measurement used to make practice visible.

Context modifier: spot, forecast, reserved, dedicated, cross-trade, pharma, emergency and other operational contexts affect applicability without changing the integrity of the principle.
PAY

Payment & documentation

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • PAY-01 · How many days usually pass from completed transport to money received?
  • PAY-02 · Can the carrier invoice promptly after delivery using reasonable evidence, without avoidable extra administrative steps?
  • PAY-03 · Are undisputed transport amounts paid normally even when another load or claim is disputed?
PEN

Penalties & claims

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • PEN-01 · Are material commercial penalties known before delivery - preferably before load acceptance?
  • PEN-02 · Before a final deduction, are cause, evidence and a real opportunity to challenge required?
  • PEN-03 · Are ordinary commercial penalties proportionate and prevented from wiping out the economics of an otherwise properly performed transport?
WAI

Waiting & time

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • WAIT-01 · Is waiting outside the carrier’s control recorded and handled under a clear, predictable rule?
HUM

Human / legal execution

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • HUM-01 · Are recurring night, weekend, holiday, relay and short-notice requirements recognised and planned as part of the service rather than treated as invisible normality?
  • HUM-02 · If a delay makes lawful delivery impossible within driving, rest or safety rules, is the operation replanned before pressure or penalty?
  • PARK-01 · Are safe parking and lawful rest considered when agreeing routes, deadlines and costs?
CAP

Capacity & tender stability

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • CAP-01 · Where capacity is reserved or dedicated, is there reciprocal protection for under-utilisation, cancellation or specific investment?
  • CAP-02 · Does contract/tender stability reasonably match the structural resources or long-term capacity requested?
  • COST-01 · Does the agreed price account for the resources and costs of performing the service lawfully?
  • COST-02 · Can material changes in fuel, tolls, taxes or operating conditions trigger an agreed review or indexation, with real negotiation and no automatic retaliation?
VIS

Subcontracting & chain visibility

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • SUB-01 · Is the physical carrier reasonably identifiable before execution?
  • SUB-02 · Is further subcontracting subject to a prior agreed, controlled and traceable mechanism?
  • SUB-03 · Are unauthorised or untraceable re-listing and resale of awarded loads prevented?
  • INT-01 · When an intermediary subcontracts transport, does it retain a clear function, responsibility or managed risk rather than merely passing pressure downstream?
VOI

Right to refuse

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • VOICE-01 · Can an unsafe, unlawful or materially changed operation be refused without automatic retaliation?
SUS

Sustainable transition

Scope → applicability → requirement → rationale → acceptable evidence → insufficient evidence → decision rule → N/A / Unknown → context → corrective action → version.

  • GREEN-01 · When greener transport requires dedicated investment or additional operational complexity, is that exposure made visible and addressed?